This Works fine but now I would like to filter the mapped XML data in the repeating control.What I have tried: I tested the Xpath on my XML file and that is correct, so think this is not the way to filter the mapping on a repeating control in MS Word.Although other content controls support standard (MSXML3) XPath syntax, the repeating section content control only appears to support very simple XPath syntax, allowing only (root selector), element name, and index predicate n, and the final element name cant have an index.Even the long form of the index predicate position() n isnt supported.
If you use any invalid XPath, Word either ignores the invalid part or returns an error, depending how you set it, so ends up treating booksbook.isbn 000 as books1book. I suspect the reason complex XPaths arent allowed is because of the way the repeating section content control is implemented: deleting the last element (for example by setting the predicate to false) deletes the template as well. ![]() Word 2016 Xml Mapping Software This EarlyHaving a working piece of software this early (despite all the scaffolding needed to make the prototype work) helps the stakeholders make a decision whether to go with a certain technology set or not. This is especially true if a number of competing solutions are being considered. The requirements are typical of a large-scale document (correspondence) generation system: large-scale generation of documents, ability to author dozens of templates, ability to generate documents by binding the templates to data from business systems, ability to support multiple document formats and ability to create workflows to support the business processes. Combining out-of-the-box functionality like Content Controls and Open Office XML SDK with a little customization to your business rules, you can automate template creation, document generation, document conversion and (using SharePoint) allow for Web-based document management. Content Controls allow a document template to be created using pre-defined pieces of content. These include text blocks, drop-down menus, combo boxes, calendar controls, etc. The screenshot pasted below further illustrates this concept. Within the pane on the right, is a XML tree structure (this could be the schema returned by the underlying Policy service). ![]() When the new document is opened, the placeholder content controls in the document are populated with business data from the underlying data feed. This API would support both interactive and batch-oriented document generation. Since the API will be self-describing using the RESTHypermedia pattern, we expect that it can be callable from any existing or new service applications. The benefit of this approach is that service clients dont need hard-coded template details. Additionally, the templates can be changed without impacting the clients. For instance, the service client will simply call a document generation method that takes template ID and the necessary parameters (self-described, as indicated earlier). Upon successful completion of the method, a URL of the generated document will be returned to the client. The URL could be pointing to a generated document resource located within a database, SharePoint document library or other storage, as needed. The service client application can then render the generated document within the service client as needed. While this example describes the interactive scenario, the batch scenario would work similarly. While light-weight editing is possible, there are a number of scenarios not supported by Microsoft Office Web App.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2020
Categories |